Police
Every call documented. Every recording admissible in court. The PATRUL ecosystem for police units: from the body camera on shift to the evidence package in a criminal case.
Challenges
What a unit loses when documentation relies on manual processes and disconnected devices.
The officer's word against the complainant's is a weak position in court and in disciplinary proceedings. Only a tamper-proof recording can strengthen it.
Consumer cameras without a digital signature cannot guarantee the integrity of a recording — the defense can call the evidence into question.
Complaints about crew conduct take weeks to review with no objective record of the event.
Recordings without verified integrity are challenged by the defense in court.
At the end of a shift, recordings are copied by hand — with the risk of loss and human error.
Flash drives and local disks: no single archive, and finding a recording takes hours.
There is no record of who viewed or copied a file before it was entered into a case.
Entering video material into proceedings means manual work with every file.
The proposed solution
A closed loop: the recording is signed on the camera, offloaded automatically, and lives in a secure archive.
The camera signs the file before the first transfer. Integrity can be proven technically.
The officer places the camera in the dock — the system does the rest: offload, hash, archive, report.
Every crew recording in one repository, searchable by time, location, and device.
The officer sees their own footage, the investigator sees cases, the commander sees the unit. Every view is logged.
Recommended equipment
The baseline kit for a patrol unit. Quantities are calculated by headcount and shift schedule.
BC-4K Pro
The crew's primary camera: 4K, GPS, up to 12 h of recording — a full shift without recharging.
DVR-X2
In-vehicle recorder: front camera plus cabin, with transmission over LTE.
DOCK-24
Station-based dock: 24 slots for parallel offloading and overnight charging.
Software platform
Configured to National Police regulations — roles, retention periods, integrations.
The platform is deployed within the agency's perimeter — on unit servers or in a secure data center. Retention and access policies are configured to orders and the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Expected outcome
Measurable changes in the unit's work after the system is deployed.
Recording follows the shift protocol — no on-the-spot decision of "to record or not."
The dock collects recordings automatically. The human factor is removed from the chain.
Instead of hours with flash drives — a filter by time, crew, or location.
An export package with a signature and chain of custody — to procedural requirements.
Use cases
Typical scenarios where a recording with verified integrity determines the outcome.
The complainant alleges an abuse of authority during a stop. The commander opens the shift recording at the timecode — the complaint is resolved on the video, not on either side's account.
The recorder captures the moment of impact from two angles. The recording, with GPS track and timecode, is entered into the administrative-offense case as objective evidence.
The investigator assembles an export package: video, metadata, hash, and access log. The defense verifies the chain of custody — there are no grounds to challenge integrity.
Solution overview for police
We'll send an overview with a kit tailored to your unit's headcount, a cost estimate, and a rollout plan — or show you the system live.